Chess Opening Comparison

(Upcoming Event)
Perlis open & Gula Perlis Open-SyedChess
(30 April dan 1 May)

Union Open Chess Tournament-Penang Chess
(27 March 2011)

(On Going Event)
National Closed
-Man
-Women




1. Some kibitzer discus that Lasker hate the hyper modern technique. Later he play that technique

2. Post mortem Alekhine win against capablanca because he study the opening better than Capa
3. Most super gm hire strong gm to develop the opening, they being called second
4. Russian school provide chess class. Actually what they teach?
5. Kasparove lost WC to Kramnik because the opening more suit to Kramnik rather than him.
6. The purpose of blitz game actually to see variations, fast thinking and familiar with the pattern.

Conservative opening

• Any opening base on our experience
• No body knows the opening, fight with natural talent.
• Easy to play- Because we create the opening base on experience
• Less time need to develop opening. We can play both patterns for the both side.
• Its stuck at certain stage, hard to play at higher level
• The discussion between user and computer.
• Base on user mood. Usually pawn storm or exchange sacrifice.
• Much more boring game, mostly conservative openings are closed game
• The idea of the opening comes from user experience. Nobody know unless user only.
• Playing countless game, learning tactical and ending game
• When occur in game, the opponent need to play with own idea and knowledge not base on his database
• If the opponents know the opening, just 5 minute computer evaluation. Sure we will crush

Modern Opening

• Top level player choice
• Play till reach novelty than fight with own style
• Though- Need knowledge to understand the opening purpose
• Need more time to study line and opening. At least need 60 opening package including black opening. But still not include sub lines.
• No limit, everyday new knowledge, idea and development
• The game discussion not just us and computer but the novelty and idea can come from any level
• Depend to mood, opponent and opening itself.
• Not so sure the type of the opening, sometimes closed, open and semi open.
• Novelty can make from computer, experience player such as GM or from database
• Basic-opening, middle game, tactical and ending.
  2nd- understand trap and gambit line
  3rd-study pawn structure
  4th-coputer evaluation of each variation
  5th-Check novelty and sacrifice game
  6th- pattern game, 7th-Bla…blaa..blaaa.
• Feel comfortable to play if the opening study well
• Waste a lot of time if we are not professional. The learning process also need experience help. Costly

I still don’t know which one to choose, because I lack of capital and time for hyper modern technique. The conservative opening seem inferior opening line….mmmm